This is a long post.  But you'll likely gain great information from it so I urge you to read it and ponder it.  I've spent the last month delving into questions I've wondered about throughout my life.  I think I've finally found some really interesting and quite possible answers that make very logical sense to me.  These theories also show how God and science could co-exist. 

If you can keep an open mind this information will make perfect sense.  If not, these theories will likely sound absurd and even a bit schizophrenic. 

I've wondered for years why the Egyptians were so advanced in comparison to other civilizations that came both before and after.  The Sumerians preceded the Egyptians in the early Middle East around 10,000 BC with one of the first large documented civilizations which kept records and used more advanced tools and agriculture.  Up to this point, there were simple Neanderthals and basic cavemen. 

The Sumerians kept stone tablets which documented their creation.  These tablets are called the Enuma Elish.  The Enuma Elish reads fairly similarly to our Kings James Version of Genesis and many of the books of the Apocrypha.   It speaks of people coming from the heavens, watchers, wars, giants and a devastating flood. 

In fact, many early civilizations kept similar records.  Almost all of the earliest records mention a giant flood, giants, and heavenly visitors. 

I'd like to propose that, if the Bible is true, it is a compiled version of these ancient "myths"... which may not be myths at all. 

Therefore, I'd like to propose that most of the megalithic structures were built around or before 10,000 BC or during the antediluvian (pre-flood) time period. 

Consider the impact of a flood.  Whether it was of divine origin or not, there is evidence that the pyramids at Giza had water lines and fossilized seashells in their walls around the bottom.  Many Egyptologists agree that the great pyramid at Giza was not a tomb, but that later pyramids were used as tombs.  The later, smaller pyramids were copy-cats of the original three pyramids, which were already there when Egypt was founded, under water. 

Nearly all ancient records and religions have their version of a Christ-like figure.  At first, I found this to be very copy-cat in nature.  But let's say we were taught of a Christ-like figure and the meaning behind this figure long ago.  Say, shortly after we were created.  Pretend for a moment that Eve was NOT literally taken from Adam's rib...pretend for a minute that we WERE divinely created, but that those stories were embellished over the years to make sense of things that were otherwise unexplainable.  Pretend for a moment that divine yet very scientific worker angels set up labs on earth and doctored DNA to match the image of God to create man.

This is perhaps why so many people cannot agree on the dates and specifics of creation. Perhaps there is more to the story which scriptures have embellished or lost along the way.    It's highly logical that there is some truth to the similar ancient texts found all over the world, but that at the same time they were written by men attempting to make sense or explain it in such a way that others could understand during the times they lived in.    

For example, we have evidence that a lot of information preceding Christianity was changed by the Roman Catholic church upon forcing everyone under Roman rule to join the church and to give up their prior pagan-gnostic texts, rituals and beliefs.  A lot of those texts were lost.  Whole libraries with thousands of scrolls were set on fire and destroyed.  People were killed so that the Roman government could gain more power under one religion.  Plato's space-age teachings were traded for a more acceptable Aristotle.  And so on.  This pattern has repeated itself all throughout history. 

The Sumerians had a Christ-like figure.  All ancient religions have a similar Christ-like figure.  Many people dismiss this as simple copycat behavior.  But I wonder if early civilizations were taught about a Christ-like figure.  Groups which seemingly never had contact with one another have similar versions and similar creation stories.  Later, the Egyptians had a Christ-like figure called Osiris.  At first I thought that the Egyptians must have copied from the Sumerians, and the Romans must have copied from the Egyptians.  And so on.  But who did the Sumerians copy from?  Now I'm not so sure.  How are they connected?  What makes the story become divine?  I think it's the three great pyramids.  Hang in there....

After hours and hours of reading and research and staying up all night I am beginning to see a pattern of symbols and very interesting correlation between ancient records.  Most read something like this:

There were visitors who came down from the heavens who created man. 

These visitors taught people knowledge:  astronomy and math and how to be and act between one another.

There were wars between the heavenly visitors.

There were good gods and bad gods - some were cast out of the group or fell away.

A Christ-like figure was spoken of and salvation was promised.

There was a giant flood.

There were giants, who were created when the visitors from heaven slept with the daughters of the men the Gods had created.  (the research here is fascinating but too much to list)

There was an evil leader who prompted the "fall" which created the giants, and angered God in such a way that the evil leader and his fallen group were cast out of the "good" group.

These early civilizations did use precise mathematics and precise astronomical information.  They knew the world was round.  They had maps of continents seemingly too far away to be reached by the means we think they had access to.

Many of these early civilizations made huge stone structures with the most basic tools - stones weighing tons which were cut and placed with such precision and fit together so perfectly you couldn't fit a hair in between. 

There is ancient artwork in caves and hieroglyphs which show what look like people with helmets or halos and flying objects. 

After reading the same patterns over and over and seeing ancient artwork from civilizations which had no contact with one another it became clear that these were copies of stories that may have happened.  As stories are told, they are changed and information is lost.  But most of the stories have the same basic information.  And there is a lot of evidence that a flood occurred after an ice age around 10,000 BC. 

I have always been fascinated with the pyramids in Egypt.  The largest pyramid has no firm evidence that anyone was ever buried inside.  There is evidence that it dates back to around 10,000 BC.  The Egyptians, who kept so many excellent records, kept no records of building the three great pyramids of Giza.  It is odd that the many pyramids built AFTER the three largest do not look the same, are much smaller and have not held up as well.  I propose that the three great pyramids of Giza were built around 10,000 BC and were standing before the flood.  Egyptians later used the already carved tunnels as tombs in two of the pyramids and added their own hieroglyphs. 

The newly found graves of the pyramid workers (which experts now say were NOT slaves but paid, respected workers) would match this theory as well because the Egyptians DID build some pyramids, they were just smaller pyramids and so they did not need slaves to make them.  These workers didn't build the largest three - those were already there. 

The three great pyramids at Giza give us so much information.  If you do some research, you will see that the pyramids told us almost everything we needed to know.  The pyramid, essentially, was a symbol.  Think about all the symbols you see which incorporate a pyramid and the Egyptian all-seeing eye.  Which is essentially a symbol of being watched over or seeing everything.  The book of Enoch speaks of "watchers".  While the actual truth of the symbol may have been lost along the way, the pyramid is still considered a sacred geometric shape. 

The great pyramid of Giza provides precise astronomical information, cuts all the land masses on the earth into four equal quarters, is a precise compass and sundial, gives us precise mathematical formulas, the sides are slightly concave to show us that the earth was round.  The list goes on and on. 

I urge you to read the Book of Enoch, a non-canonized addition to the Apocrypha.  It's no wonder why something like this would have been kept out of the bible.   I believe there is some divine truth to the myths that all the ancient civilizations seem to match up on.  The Dead Sea Scrolls confirm all these theories. 

I believe Enoch built the three great pyramids.  I believe they were a symbol which were built to give us a sacred reminder and the information we would need as we progressed.  And I think I know the basics on how and why this was done.  In fact The Book of Revelation (and many other scriptures) speak of a pillar and alter which God has left us in the land of Egypt:  The pyramids. 

Here's where the truth gets lost: how many times have you heard in your church, any church, that Enoch left us a pyramid which would give us all the spiritual, scientific, mathematical and astronomical information we would need to know while here on earth?  Almost never. 

Yet, early Masons and groups held on to this knowledge through time, passing it from one generation to the next.  I doubt even today that many really KNOW what the compass and square mean.  Essentially "squaring the circle" meant achieving spiritual enlightenment.   Something like this (look closely to see the human figure within the pyramid):



I find it quite interesting that there is an intricate shape in math which is considered the most absolutely perfect and beautiful shape ever discovered.  It's been theorized that this shape makes up the very fabric of our universe and is a very simple "theory of everything", that as these shapes spin over space-time each point on the shape contains an element which combines in certain ways with other shapes as they spin to make the atoms of all matter fit and work together perfectly.  If this shape is the fabric of the universe then the universe (or "God") is very aware of us and there is a scientific means to achieving spiritual enlightenment.

I believe there is life on other planets and that our earth has been visited many times.  Perhaps our very earth has been re-used several times. If angels ARE divine and if heavenly figures were told to "go down and make man in our image" then WE are the missing link.  This explains why scientists can't figure out exactly when and how intelligent homo sapiens came along.  Because we ARE the aliens.   This would explain virgin births (artificial insemination) and half-Gods like Christ who could obviously and very logically do divine things.  It appears then that many of these angel/aliens were helpful and good and even divine by way of alternate paranormal dimensions within our universe.  This explains numerous descriptions in the Bible and other early sacred texts which speak of being guided, translated or visited by heavenly figures.  When I think of divinity more scientifically, I can really wrap my mind around this theory.  There are good aliens and bad aliens:  Angels and Demons, and they can affect or interact with humans as they wish through space/time dimensions. 

Ancient people bound their heads to make them look like cones.  But why?  Is it because visitors had more elongated heads?  Did some of the aliens stay on earth?  There is a lot of Egyptian artwork which depicts the royal family having elongated heads.  Interestingly, elongated skulls have been found all over the world.   

Perhaps there is one GOD but he's like a chef with many workers (angels) and many who have fallen away (demons).  I think of this in terms of a giant intergalactic war of good and evil to keep life going.  The difference from mainstream literature and art is that perhaps angels are more intergalactic, space-age looking than pretty floating roman looking people with wings that play harps all day.  

One could argue that while all this sounds logical there need not be anything divine behind it.  But I do  think there is something divine to it.  I think that the great pyramid of Giza was that symbol to show us it was all divine.  Bear with me.  The best points are yet to follow.  And I think I know how the pyramids were built!

I think our purpose in life is achieving ultimate enlightenment in which we ascend and become something more than this life.  Perhaps God is love and we are to achieve the ultimate ability to love unconditionally.  I don't know how much more we'll become or what it all means exactly.  I still don't know why bad things happen to good people.  This is why I wonder if it was OUR job to share these messages and God left it to us and stepped back.  I can't know for sure but what I do understand is that space-time theories and mathematical equations "prove" parallel universes.  When you mention something like "parallel universe" all human understanding goes out the door.  Anything is possible at that point including divine intervention or creation or angel and demon aliens.    

I think ancient people like Enoch achieved this enlightenment.  I think the Buddhists and other religions which use their bodies to achieve a higher state of wellness have a big part of this truth.  I think many prophets through many religions have parts of these truths.  Despite knowing these things, over time religions become very Americanized.  The Egyptians knew of these lost truths because of what they were taught.  So did the Sumerians.  That Christ-like figure has always existed.  But over time, its changed and molded to match the religion it existed within. 

The pyramid and sacred geometry did not change, though.  Groups like the Masons kept the secrets of the meaning of sacred geometry and the pyramid.  I think religion and groups like the Masons have become very Americanized and changed so much that their followers simply go through the rituals and never fully understand the meanings of the secrets they have protected over the years.  I doubt any basic American Mason today could tell me Enoch built the pyramids as the ultimate symbol for God or how it was done.  It does make more sense now why the LDS temples borrow so many freemasonry symbols but most people will never know or even believe the meaning behind the great pyramids being built by Enoch as a symbol of God.  If there is a God, he is not fully found just going through the motions and doing everything "this one way" because a higher official tells you to.  He's found by achieving inner spiritual enlightenment, becoming one with the universe.

This is why I felt the need to remove myself from all religious organizations to find these things out for myself.  I have not been taught these things in any church.  Despite the many churches I've been to over the last half of my lifetime (not just LDS, but Catholic and Lutheran), I have grown very little spiritually.  I find most of church time is taken up by prayers and hymns or more recently having to leave and walk my children in the halls.  I'm not saying "everyone stop going to church!"  But for me, personally, I just don't think the truth is all there under one roof, either.  I think churches are run by men and men change things to match up with their own agenda, whatever that agenda might be. 

I urge you to keep the reason behind going to church close to your heart and even if you love your church (more power to you!) keep searching for true enlightenment.  Instead, I think many people focus more on cultural aspects and "how they should be acting in comparison to how Suzy and Johnny are acting" than achieving true spiritual enlightenment.  With this comes judgment and hypocrisy. 

For example, many churches claim to be the one true church and scoff at, say, a Buddhist Monk as being old-school and out of place in this world.  When in fact the Buddhist Monk is probably far more enlightened than we Americans will ever be - he's left behind worldly things, including sex, to focus his entire life on gaining spiritual enlightenment and becoming one with God. 

So it makes me laugh when Suzy and Johnny say they're ultimately "saved" just because they go to their Americanized church, sing some hymns or count some beads but learned nothing about gaining true peace and balance and enlightenment which these ancient symbols like the pyramids teach us.  Ironically, Suzy and Johnny think they're going to heaven and that the poor Buddhist Monk is damned.  I suppose that has been my problem with organized religion for a long time, not just the LDS church, but ANY church. 

Many scholars have theories of how the pyramids were built.  So do I.  So did Edward Leedskalnin. From 1923 to 1951, this 100 pound, 5 foot tall Edward Leedskalnin single-handedly and secretly carved over 1,100 tons of coral rock, and his unknown process has created one of the world's most mysterious accomplishments, the Corral Castle.  He also wrote five pamphets, which drip with riddles waiting to be discovered.  Ed's family came from a long line of stone carvers. 

It is not too farfetched to believe that Ed's family passed secrets through their generations.  Knowledge of how to carve and move huge stones that weighed tons and how to fit them precisely together using only simple tools.  One obelisk Ed moved by himself weighed 28 tons.  Sounds crazy, right?  There must be a hoax to this.  That's what we immediately think because we cannot think outside the box.  Imagine the implications if we all learned these secrets. 

The secret is ANTI-GRAVITY. 

Before you scoff, consider: our own Government has been using anti-gravity to create weapons of warfare.  They also know this secret.  They have developed rail guns which combine this knowledge of combining polar opposites, magnetic fields, energy and mass to create anti-gravity.  They have tested "UFOs" which can levitate.  In fact, our government, Ed, and ancients like Enoch (and others from the past who built megalithic structures) have all somehow learned the secret of the "world grid": an invisible pattern of energy lines surrounding the Earth which concentrates points of telluric power where they intersect. It was here, at one of these intersections of Earth energy, that Ed was able to move his prodigious stone blocks using the unseen power of our planet.  This is why the pyramids are so precise and why the ancients needed and achieved such a knowledge of our solar system, cycles of planets, our poles and moon.  They were able to move anything easily.  This brings new meaning to moving mountains with faith.  By becoming enlightened to our space and connection within the universe anything is truly possible. 

This sounds crazy, but I believe it to be the absolute truth.  There are too many huge stone structures from around this time period (around 10,000 BC) which humans today cannot explain.  There were great civilizations before the flood (this is where myths of a great ancient nation called Atlantis come from).  These civilizations knew more about physical enlightenment, poles, electro-magnetics than we give them credit for.  It was still new to them.  But they quickly became worldly and used this knowledge for their own gain, becoming greedy. 

It IS a divine knowledge.  A knowledge which has been kept secret for years through secret societies and passed on through symbols.  You only need read through ancient texts and do your own research and you will find this to be true.  There are even ancient texts which speak of "floating stones"!!! 

As with any major archeological find, history is written in such a way that the vast public can understand it and feel comfortable with it.  This is why, even though there is so much evidence pointing at the largest pyramids being built around 10,000 BC, history doesn't change much.  We accept that the pyramids were build around 2500 BC because it feels more comfortable.  Take, for example, the several latest pyramids in Bosnia which were found around 2005.  Work is still being done to excavate these great pyramids which are dated to around 11,000 BC.  One is even larger than the great pyramid at Giza.  These pyramids in Bosnia are hidden from plain site because of the growth and vegetation and trees which grew over them.  Almost 15,000 years later they just look like big tree covered hills instead of the ancient temples which lay under layers of earth.

Imagine the implications if European history had to be rewritten to show that ancient European cavemen had the abilities and knowledge to make these pyramids before the Egyptians supposedly did.  Archeologists scoff at the founder of the Bosnian pyramids saying he doesn't know what he's talking about and that it's all a huge hoax and that no Europeans at that time could have built these pyramids.  There has not been a lot of media regarding this find, either.  It's all been sort of swept under the rug.  But the excavation and work is still going on, and new artifacts are being found regularly.

This is an example of how archeologists stick with the status quo so as not to change history as we know it - just like governments conceal certain knowledge from the general public. 

There was a flood.  Ancient people before this flood DID have this knowledge.  Some kept the knowledge alive.  Some perhaps figured it out along the way (perhaps this explains why some magicians like David Copperfield can do such amazing tricks that seem so magical). 

The pyramids were built to give us a symbol of the higher meaning of our universe, ourselves, our purpose, our Savior.  Not our Roman-American looking savior, but something much higher than that.  This knowledge has been changed over and over through the years.  I think ALL religions today have bits of the truth.  I don't think there is ONE true church.  I do believe there have been enlightened, inspired people of all religions, "prophets", those who have written scriptures, scientists, mathematicians, etc.  But I think those people are still just men.  They are still just humans who make human decisions.  This could be the reason there are so many good scriptures which should not necessarily be taken literally at all times and why some are so contradictory and why people in power tend to mold and change things which support their needs and purposes. 

I hope you'll forgive me if I don't write this in a research-paper style.  I do have a huge bibliography from the last month: days in the library, searching online, sleepless nights of reading, scriptures from all over the world, etc.  But I also have an almost two year old and a three year old interrupting me every five minutes as I try to put it into words.  If you want more information, please let me know.  I'll be happy to share where I found exact information.   

I'll end this post with my best Elle Woods impression:

"The rules of anti-gravity are simple and finite. Any Cosmo girl would have known!"